United States v. Blakney
This text of 585 F. App'x 259 (United States v. Blakney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[260]*260Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Joneathon Lorenzo Blakney appeals the district court’s amended judgment granting the Government’s Fed.R. Crim.P. 35(b) motion and reducing his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the amended judgment. See United States v. Davis, 679 F.3d 190, 194-96 (4th Cir.2012) (holding that district court may consider 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2012) factors when deciding the extent of sentence reduction after granting Rule 35(b) relief). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
585 F. App'x 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-blakney-ca4-2014.