United States v. Blakely

103 F. App'x 790

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lori D. Blakely appeals the district court’s orders denying her motion to compel the Government to file a motion under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) and motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the dis trict court. See United States v. Blakely, Nos. CR-97-678 (D.S.C. May 25, 2004; Feb. 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED