United States v. Blake

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Blake

268 F. App'x 311

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Blake. Read the opinion of the Court — 408 F. App'x 785 →

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 5, 2008·No. 07-10907·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jennifer Lou Blake raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 119 (5th Cir. 2005), which held that a defendant is not entitled to a jury trial to determine whether the terms of supervised release have been violated. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, *312 and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jennifer Lou Blake raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 119 (5th Cir. 2005), which held that a defendant is not entitled to a jury trial to determine whether the terms of supervised release have been violated. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, *312 and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States v. Blake, 268 F. App'x 311 (5th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

268 F. App'x 311 (United States v. Blake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related