United States v. Blair

10 M.J. 54, 1980 CMA LEXIS 9776
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided November 24, 1980·No. No. 38,574; SPCM 14201·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

We granted review of this case to determine whether prosecution exhibit 3-DA Form 2627-was properly admitted into evidence by the military judge. We notice that the commander did not complete block 8 of the form which states: “You are advised of your right to appeal this punishment within_days to_, the next superior authority.” However, just beneath this block the accused signed and dated a block indicating that he did not wish to appeal. Under these circumstances the failure to complete block 8 is not sufficient to require exclusion of the exhibit. Cf. United States v. Mack, 9 M.J. 300 (C.M.A.1980); United States v. Negrone, 9 M.J. 171 (C.M.A.1980).

Accordingly, the decision of the United States Army Court of Military Review is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Blair, 10 M.J. 54, 1980 CMA LEXIS 9776 (cma 1980).

10 M.J. 54 (United States v. Blair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Haynes
10 M.J. 694 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1981)