United States v. Bladen

24 F. Cas. 1161, 1 Pet. C.C. 213
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 15, 1816
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 F. Cas. 1161 (United States v. Bladen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Bladen, 24 F. Cas. 1161, 1 Pet. C.C. 213 (circtdpa 1816).

Opinion

WASHINGTON, Circuit Justice,

charged the jury to direct their attention exclusively to the count for confining the captain; and advised an acquittal upon the other count, in case the jury should find the defendant guilty on the first count. See the case of U. S. v. Sharp [Case No. 16,264].

He stated to them, that if the captain was restrained from performing the duties of his station, by such mutinous conduct of his crew, as might reasonably intimidate .a firm man; this would amount to a constructive confinement, within the meaning of the law; and that it made-no difference in this respect, that the master did, in fact, go unmolested to every part of his vessel, whenever he pleased; if he was compelled, by a regard for his own safety, to go armed; and if in the opinion of the jury, from all the circumstances of the case, it was necessary or prudent for him to do so.

But secondly, that the seizing the captain by the defendant, amounted to an actual confinement, although the restraint continued only a minute or two; the law making no distinction as to the duration of the confinement. That the raising of the chair by the captain, and pushing the defendant from him, did not justify the defendant in seizing the captain; it was his duty to have gone forward, as he was ordered to do, and which this act was only intended to enforce. 2

Verdict, “Guilty.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Huff
13 F. 630 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 F. Cas. 1161, 1 Pet. C.C. 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bladen-circtdpa-1816.