United States v. Blackshear

Third Circuit

United States v. Blackshear

532 F. App'x 316

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedAugust 12, 2013

DocketNo. 12-1485

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 532 F. App'x 316 (United States v. Blackshear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Blackshear, 532 F. App'x 316 (3d Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

Jamar Blackshear and his codefendant, Terrell Davis, appeal the denial of their suppression motion. Blackshear has standing to challenge the search of the rental vehicle under United States v. Baker, 221 F.3d 438, 442-43 (3d Cir.2000). For the reasons stated in Parts I and II of the companion case, United States v. Davis, No. 12-1486, 726 F.3d 434 (3d Cir. Aug. 9, 2013), we will affirm the District Court’s judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

Jamar Blackshear and his codefendant, Terrell Davis, appeal the denial of their suppression motion. Blackshear has standing to challenge the search of the rental vehicle under United States v. Baker, 221 F.3d 438, 442-43 (3d Cir.2000). For the reasons stated in Parts I and II of the companion case, United States v. Davis, No. 12-1486, 726 F.3d 434 (3d Cir. Aug. 9, 2013), we will affirm the District Court’s judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

532 F. App'x 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-blackshear-ca3-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack