United States v. Blackmon
This text of United States v. Blackmon (United States v. Blackmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 4, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41175 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TIMOTHY M. BLACKMON,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CR-97-2 --------------------
Before DUHÉ, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:1
Timothy M. Blackmon appeals the sentence he received after he
pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine in
violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). Blackmon argues that the district
court erred when it denied him a two-level adjustment in his base
offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 for acceptance of
responsibility. Given that Blackmon was not sufficiently
forthcoming in his first conversation with the probation officer,
the district court’s denial of the adjustment should not be
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. disturbed. United States v. Medina-Anicacio, 325 F.3d 628, 648
(5th Cir. 2003); United States v. Washington, 320 F.3d 322, 327
(5th Cir.), cert. denied, 124 S. Ct. 942 (2003).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Blackmon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-blackmon-ca5-2004.