United States v. Blackmon
Opinion
Timothy M. Blackmon appeals the sentence he received after he pleaded guilty [235]*235to possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). Blackmon argues that the district court erred when it denied him a two-level adjustment in his base offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 for acceptance of responsibility. Given that Blackmon was not sufficiently forthcoming in his first conversation with the probation officer, the district court’s denial of the adjustment should not be disturbed. United States v. Medina-Anicacio, 325 F.3d 638, 648 (5th Cir.2003); United States v. Washington, 340 F.3d 222, 227 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 942, 157 L.Ed.2d 757 (2003).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
96 F. App'x 234 (United States v. Blackmon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.