United States v. Black

167 F.2d 167, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2418
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 1, 1948
DocketNo. 12258
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 167 F.2d 167 (United States v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Black, 167 F.2d 167, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2418 (5th Cir. 1948).

Opinion

LEE, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida granting a petition for restoration to the owners, appellees here, of 120 acres of land, the use of which was condemned by the War Department in July of 1944. The land was taken to be used as a part of the Miami Army Air Base and was condemned for a period of years ending June ■ 30, 1945, and extendable for yearly periods thereafter during the national emergency, at the election of the Government.1 The estate taken was renewed annually through June 30, 1947, and on May 21, 1947, within the time required, the United States filed notice of renewal for a period ending June 30, 1948, and deposited with the court the required rental. The deposit was refused, and in August of 1947, the owners demanded restoration on the grounds (1) that on December 28, 1945, the Congress terminated the authority of the United' States to acquire property or any use thereof or interest therein; (2) that the entire ■ Second War Powers Act 50 U.S.GA.Appendix, § 631, et seq., was repealed as of March 31, 1947, and hence there could be no renewal after that date. Holding that the entire Second War Powers Act was repealed as of March 3.1, 1947, and that with the repeal of the Act itself there could thereafter be no exercise of any right granted by it, the court cancelled the renewal notice filed by the Government and ordered the property restored to the owners. This appeal followed. The sole question before us is the correctness of the lower court's ruling.

The Government contends (1) that the right of renewal continued in it for the duration of the national emergency, and that the repeal of the Second War Powers Act terminated only its right to acquire property, the use thereof, or an interest therein, but did not affect its power to renew, a right it acquired in the condemnation proceeding; (2) that the right to renew acquired in the condemnation pro[169]*169ceeding was acquired under authority vested in the Secretary of War by the Act of July 2, 1917, and the Second War Powers Act, and that, if the latter Act was held to have abated as of March 31, 1947, still the Secretary of War had power to exercise that right under the Act of July 2, 1917.

We rest our decision upon the second ground. The pertinent parts of the Act of July 2, 1917, 50 U.S.C.A. § 171; of Title II of the Second War Powers Act of March 27, 1942, 50 U.S.C.A. § 171a; 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 632; of the Act of December 28, 1945, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 632a; and of the Act of June 29, 1946, 60 Stat. 345, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 645, are set forth in the margin.2

Under the Act of July 2, 1917, the Secretary of War was authorized to cause to be instituted in the name of the United States in any court having jurisdiction, proceedings for the acquirement by condemnation of any land, temporary use thereof, or other interest therein, or right pertaining thereto, needed for a site for military purposes. Title II of the Second War Powers Act, while naming the Secretary of War among those authorized, chiefly granted an extension of the power of condemnation to “the Secretary of the Navy, or any other officer, board, commission, or governmental corporation authorized by the President.” With respect to the condemnation before us, the authority of the Secretary of War under the 1917 Act was as broad as the authority of the Secretary of War under Title II, Second War Powers Act.

By the Act of December 28, 1945, it was provided that the authority to acquire property or any use thereof or interest therein under Title II of the Second War Powers Act, should not be exercised after [170]*170the date upon which the 1945 Act became effective, and in the Act it was provided that the provisions of Title II should remain in force until June 30, 1946, or such earlier time as Congress by concurrent resolution, or the President, might designate. Under the Act of December 28, 1945, the right to acquire property under the Second War Powers' Act or any use thereof or interest therein terminated on June 30, 1946, in the absence of action by Congress or the President. However, on June 29, 1946, one day before termination, Congress passed the Act of that date, providing that Title II should'remain in force until March 31, 1947, unless Congress by concurrent resolution, or the President, should designate an earlier date. The effect of the Act of June 29, 1946, was to continue in force Title II of the Second War Powers Act of 1942, beyond June 30, 1946, to March 31, 1947. As has been pointed out, Title II of the Second War Powers Act conferred no power upon the Secretary of War with respect to the condemnation before us which he did not enjoy under the Act of July 2, 1917. Nor was his power under the 1917 Act affected by the repeal of Title II of the Second War Powers Act. This is made clear in the Act of June 29, 1946, for it provides:

“* * * after such amendments [Title II of the Second War Powers Act was an amendment to the Act of July 2, 1917,] cease to be in force, any provision of law amended thereby [that is, the Act of July 2, 1917,] shall-be in full force and effect as though this Act [Second War Powers Act] had not been enacted.”

The repeal, therefore, of Title II of the Second War Powers Act by the Act of June 29, 1946, effective March 31, 1947, left unimpaired the Act of July 2, 1917, and since the 120 acres in this case was condemned under that Act as well as under the Second War Powers Act, it follows that the renewal notice together with the deposit with the court of the required rental, extended the rights of the United States under the condemnation proceeding to and including June 30, 1948.

The contention of appellees that no consideration was paid in the condemnation proceeding- for the right of renewal, if it had merit, comes too late.

r The order cancelling and terminating the notice of renewal and ordering the property restored to appellees is reversed and set aside, and the cause is remanded with instructions to dismiss the petition for restoration of the property.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Catlin
204 F.2d 661 (Seventh Circuit, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 F.2d 167, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-black-ca5-1948.