United States v. Bittel, Tepel & Eilers
This text of 155 F. 554 (United States v. Bittel, Tepel & Eilers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
I am inclined to the opinion that the words “japanned calfskins” in the section must be construed as meaning only such as are not upper leather, dressed or undressed. It appears from the finding of the Board that the article is commercially known as “patent leather,” and is, in fact, an upper leather.
The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 F. 554, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bittel-tepel-eilers-circtsdny-1892.