United States v. Bittel, Tepel & Eilers
155 F. 554, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1562
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided June 13, 1892·No. No. 539·Published
Opinion
I am inclined to the opinion that the words “japanned calfskins” in the section must be construed as meaning only such as are not upper leather, dressed or undressed. It appears from the finding of the Board that the article is commercially known as “patent leather,” and is, in fact, an upper leather.
The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Bittel, Tepel & Eilers, 155 F. 554, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1562 (circtsdny 1892).
155 F. 554 (United States v. Bittel, Tepel & Eilers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.