United States v. Bishop

191 F. Supp. 160
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Bishop. Read the opinion of the Court — 188 F. Supp. 804
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin·Decided February 17, 1961·No. Nos. 59-CR-52, 59-CR-139·Published

Opinion

GRUBB, District Judge.

Plaintiff, United States of America, has moved for a rehearing of the matters considered in this court’s decision and order of December 6, 1960, 188 F.Supp. 804. The defendants, Irving Isadore Lichterman, Daniel Edward Wigodski, Jacob Louis Shubow, and Eugene Philip Gillis, have made a motion to dismiss the motion of the plaintiff for rehearing.

The matter was submitted on briefs. The court has carefully considered the material submitted and finds no basis for granting any rehearing. The court is of the opinion that this matter is squarely governed by Napue v. People of State of Illinois, 1959, 360 U.S. 264, 79 S.Ct. 1173, 3 L.Ed.2d 1217.

The motion for rehearing is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bishop, 191 F. Supp. 160 (E.D. Wis. 1961).

191 F. Supp. 160 (United States v. Bishop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Napue v. Illinois
360 U.S. 264 (Supreme Court, 1959)
United States v. Bishop
188 F. Supp. 804 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1960)