United States v. Birky

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Birky

139 F. App'x 886

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 20, 2005

DocketNo. 03-30405

StatusPublished

This text of 139 F. App'x 886 (United States v. Birky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Birky, 139 F. App'x 886 (9th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

In light of the United States Supreme Court’s order of January 24, 2005, granting appellant’s petition for certiorari and vacating our judgment, appellant’s sentence is hereby vacated and this matter is remanded to the district court for resentencing in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) and United States v. Ameline, (9th Cir. June 1, 2005) (409 F.3d 1073, 2005 WL 1291977).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

In light of the United States Supreme Court’s order of January 24, 2005, granting appellant’s petition for certiorari and vacating our judgment, appellant’s sentence is hereby vacated and this matter is remanded to the district court for resentencing in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) and United States v. Ameline, (9th Cir. June 1, 2005) (409 F.3d 1073, 2005 WL 1291977).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 F. App'x 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-birky-ca9-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack