United States v. Birky

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Birky

139 F. App'x 886

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Birky. Read the opinion of the Court — 101 F. App'x 701 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 20, 2005·No. No. 03-30405·Published

Opinion

ORDER

In light of the United States Supreme Court’s order of January 24, 2005, granting appellant’s petition for certiorari and vacating our judgment, appellant’s sentence is hereby vacated and this matter is remanded to the district court for resentencing in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) and United States v. Ameline, (9th Cir. June 1, 2005) (409 F.3d 1073, 2005 WL 1291977).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

In light of the United States Supreme Court’s order of January 24, 2005, granting appellant’s petition for certiorari and vacating our judgment, appellant’s sentence is hereby vacated and this matter is remanded to the district court for resentencing in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) and United States v. Ameline, (9th Cir. June 1, 2005) (409 F.3d 1073, 2005 WL 1291977).

United States v. Birky, 139 F. App'x 886 (9th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

139 F. App'x 886 (United States v. Birky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related