United States v. Binyamin Stimler

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Binyamin Stimler. Read the opinion of the Court — 864 F.3d 253
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided July 17, 2017·No. 15-4053·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Nos. 15-4053, 15-4094 & 15-4095 ____________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

BINYAMIN STIMLER,

Appellant in No. 15-4053

JAY GOLDSTEIN a/k/a Yaakov

JAY GOLDSTEIN,

Appellant in No. 15-4094

MENDEL EPSTEIN,

Appellant in No. 15-4095

Before: CHAGARES, RESTREPO and ROTH, Circuit Judges ORDER

By letter dated July 7, 2017, Counsel for Appellee has advised of factual errors

contained within the opinion. Upon consideration of counsel’s letter, the Court has

determined that an amended opinion will be issued. The amendment does not alter the

Court’s judgment previously entered on July 7, 2017.

By the Court,

/s/ Jane R. Roth Circuit Judge

Dated: July 17, 2017

kr/cjg/cc: All Counsel of Record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Binyamin Stimler, (3d Cir. 2017).

United States v. Binyamin Stimler (United States v. Binyamin Stimler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.