United States v. Billy Welch
This text of United States v. Billy Welch (United States v. Billy Welch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 98-2843 ___________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * Billy Edward Welch, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * ___________
Submitted: May 3, 1999 Filed: May 12, 1999 ___________
Before BEAM, HANSEN, and FAGG, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
Billy Edward Welch pleaded guilty for conspiring to distribute methamphetamine and for attempting to escape. On appeal, Welch contends the district court improperly rejected his request to withdraw his guilty plea. Having searched the record and considered the parties' submissions, we find no merit in Welch's contention that he had been subjected to threats and intimidation by Arkansas law enforcement officers. We decline to consider Welch's ineffective assistance of counsel arguments. See United States v. Iversen, 90 F.3d 1340, 1342 (8th Cir. 1996) (ineffective assistance claim raised for first time on appeal is properly addressed in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion). We thus affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Billy Welch, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-billy-welch-ca8-1999.