United States v. Billy Ray Carlisle
This text of 418 F.2d 921 (United States v. Billy Ray Carlisle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
418 F.2d 921
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
Billy Ray CARLISLE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 586-69.
No. 587-69.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
January 5, 1970.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma; Frederick A. Daugherty, Judge.
Appellant has filed briefs in both cases.
John O. Sparks, Asst. U. S. Atty., has filed a brief in Case No. 586-69 for plaintiff.
Before LEWIS and SETH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On review of the record in these cases and the briefs of the parties submitted under Rule 10, we conclude that the appellate issues presented are without merit and so insubstantial as to not require oral argument. The judgments are therefore affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum decision of the district court. 303 F.Supp. 627.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
418 F.2d 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-billy-ray-carlisle-ca10-1970.