United States v. Billy Delano Walden, United States of America v. Gene Claude Easterling, United States of America v. John Thomas Ard, United States of America v. Fruent C. Kimes, United States of America v. Albert Harry Weathersby, United States of America v. Joe Pat Damour, United States of America v. Robert Emerson White, United States of America v. Louis Paul Matranga, United States of America v. William Steven Cook, United States of America v. Richard Brent Hogan
This text of 458 F.2d 36 (United States v. Billy Delano Walden, United States of America v. Gene Claude Easterling, United States of America v. John Thomas Ard, United States of America v. Fruent C. Kimes, United States of America v. Albert Harry Weathersby, United States of America v. Joe Pat Damour, United States of America v. Robert Emerson White, United States of America v. Louis Paul Matranga, United States of America v. William Steven Cook, United States of America v. Richard Brent Hogan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
458 F.2d 36
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Billy Delano WALDEN, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Gene Claude EASTERLING, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
John Thomas ARD, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Fruent C. KIMES, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Albert Harry WEATHERSBY, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Joe Pat DAMOUR, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Robert Emerson WHITE, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Louis Paul MATRANGA, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
William Steven COOK, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Richard Brent HOGAN, Appellant.
Nos. 14974-14983.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
May 4, 1972.
ORDER
On reconsideration en banc, the decision of the district court with respect to the question of double jeopardy is affirmed by an equally divided court.
The cases are remanded by the full court to the original panel for disposition of the remaining questions on appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
458 F.2d 36, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-billy-delano-walden-united-states-of-america-v-gene-ca4-1972.