United States v. Billy Austin Bryant

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Billy Austin Bryant

417 F.2d 636

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 13, 1969

Docket13453_1

StatusPublished

This text of 417 F.2d 636 (United States v. Billy Austin Bryant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Billy Austin Bryant, 417 F.2d 636 (4th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

To set aside his conviction of escape from the District of Columbia Reformatory at Lorton, Virginia, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751(a), Billy Austin Bryant assigns error to the trial court’s reception at trial of a prosecution witness’ answer on cross-examination. Assuming the ruling was erroneous, it was harmless. Certainly it does not justify reversal of the conviction, which is supported by copious evidence. Rule 52(a) F.R.Crim.P.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

To set aside his conviction of escape from the District of Columbia Reformatory at Lorton, Virginia, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751(a), Billy Austin Bryant assigns error to the trial court’s reception at trial of a prosecution witness’ answer on cross-examination. Assuming the ruling was erroneous, it was harmless. Certainly it does not justify reversal of the conviction, which is supported by copious evidence. Rule 52(a) F.R.Crim.P.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

417 F.2d 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-billy-austin-bryant-ca4-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack