United States v. Bilal Hamid Ali

52 F.3d 326, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18052, 1995 WL 218490
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 12, 1995·No. 94-1653·Published

Opinion

52 F.3d 326
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Bilal Hamid ALI, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-1653.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 12, 1995.

Before: MERRITT, LIVELY, and KEITH; Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bilal Hamid Ali, 52 F.3d 326, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18052, 1995 WL 218490 (6th Cir. 1995).

52 F.3d 326 (United States v. Bilal Hamid Ali) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.