United States v. Bigney

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Bigney

697 F. App'x 654

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided September 15, 2017·No. No. 17-11311 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM;

Robert Bigney appeals his 24-month total sentence imposed after the district court revoked his term of supervised release, To the extent he challenges the district court’s- guideline calculation, we do not review Bigney’s claim because he waived that argument at sentencing. Furthermore, Bigney’s sentences were substantively reasonable: they were within his guideline range, and the court considered the relevant sentencing factors and the parties’ arguments—including those about Bigney’s ADHD—at sentencing.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM;

Robert Bigney appeals his 24-month total sentence imposed after the district court revoked his term of supervised release, To the extent he challenges the district court’s- guideline calculation, we do not review Bigney’s claim because he waived that argument at sentencing. Furthermore, Bigney’s sentences were substantively reasonable: they were within his guideline range, and the court considered the relevant sentencing factors and the parties’ arguments—including those about Bigney’s ADHD—at sentencing.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Bigney, 697 F. App'x 654 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

697 F. App'x 654 (United States v. Bigney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.