United States v. Bigney

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Bigney

697 F. App'x 654

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedSeptember 15, 2017

DocketNo. 17-11311 Non-Argument Calendar

StatusPublished

This text of 697 F. App'x 654 (United States v. Bigney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Bigney, 697 F. App'x 654 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM;

Robert Bigney appeals his 24-month total sentence imposed after the district court revoked his term of supervised release, To the extent he challenges the district court’s- guideline calculation, we do not review Bigney’s claim because he waived that argument at sentencing. Furthermore, Bigney’s sentences were substantively reasonable: they were within his guideline range, and the court considered the relevant sentencing factors and the parties’ arguments—including those about Bigney’s ADHD—at sentencing.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM;

Robert Bigney appeals his 24-month total sentence imposed after the district court revoked his term of supervised release, To the extent he challenges the district court’s- guideline calculation, we do not review Bigney’s claim because he waived that argument at sentencing. Furthermore, Bigney’s sentences were substantively reasonable: they were within his guideline range, and the court considered the relevant sentencing factors and the parties’ arguments—including those about Bigney’s ADHD—at sentencing.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

697 F. App'x 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bigney-ca11-2017.