United States v. Bigback
71 M.J. 8, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 1072
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedDecember 20, 2011
DocketNo. 12-0071/AR
StatusPublished
This text of 71 M.J. 8 (United States v. Bigback) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Bigback, 71 M.J. 8, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 1072 (Ark. 2011).
Opinion
CCA 20101044. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE SPECIFICATION OF CHARGE II FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE BECAUSE IT DOES NOT ALLEGE, EXPRESSLY OR BY NECESSARY IMPLICATION, THE ‘TERMINAL ELEMENT' AS [9]*9REQUIRED BY UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011).
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Fosler
70 M.J. 225 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 M.J. 8, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 1072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bigback-armfor-2011.