United States v. Bickham
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 3, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 02-30862 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LIONEL BICKHAM,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 02-CR-15-ALL-J
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Lionel Bickham appeals his sentence following his conviction
by a jury for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation
of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). Bickham argues that the
district court erred in increasing his offense level pursuant to
Sentencing Guidelines § 2K2.1(b)(5), which provides for a four-
level increase “[i]f the defendant used or possessed any firearm or
ammunition in connection with another felony offense.” Bickham
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. admits that the crack cocaine found in his possession was for his
personal use. The firearm, which was present in the vehicle at the
time of his arrest, could have been used to facilitate his drug-
related activities.1 The district court did not err in applying
the adjustment to Bickham’s offense level because the firearm was
possessed in connection with Bickham’s drug possession within the
meaning of Sentencing Guidelines § 2K2.1(b)(5).
AFFIRMED.
1 See United States v. Armstead, 114 F.3d 504, 511-12 (5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Condren, 18 F.3d 1190, 1199-1200 (5th Cir. 1994).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Bickham (United States v. Bickham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.