United States v. Bey

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Bey

670 F. App'x 826

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 22, 2016·No. No. 16-7008·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sharu Bey appeals the district court’s text order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bey, No. 3:07-cr-00079-FDW-2 (W.D.N.C. July 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sharu Bey appeals the district court’s text order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bey, No. 3:07-cr-00079-FDW-2 (W.D.N.C. July 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Bey, 670 F. App'x 826 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

670 F. App'x 826 (United States v. Bey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.