United States v. Beverly

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6165

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENNETH D. BEVERLY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate Judge. (3:05-cr-00526-HEH-1)

Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 4, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth D. Beverly, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant II, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kenneth D. Beverly appeals the district court’s order

denying his request for documents pursuant to the Freedom of

Information Act. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Beverly, No.

3:05-cr-00526-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2008). We deny Beverly’s

motions for appointment of counsel, to compel production of

exculpatory evidence, to compel immediate release, to terminate

forfeiture order, for mandamus, and to correct sanctions. We

grant Beverly’s motions to file supplemental informal briefs and

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED