United States v. Bettis

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Bettis

325 F. App'x 858

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 6, 2009·No. No. 07-15184·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

William Scully, Jr., appointed counsel for Leanthony Lee Bettis, filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issue of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bettis’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

William Scully, Jr., appointed counsel for Leanthony Lee Bettis, filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issue of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bettis’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Bettis, 325 F. App'x 858 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

325 F. App'x 858 (United States v. Bettis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related