United States v. Best

8 C.M.A. 592, 8 USCMA 592, 1958 CMA LEXIS 736
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedJanuary 10, 1958
DocketNo. 10,678
StatusPublished

This text of 8 C.M.A. 592 (United States v. Best) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Best, 8 C.M.A. 592, 8 USCMA 592, 1958 CMA LEXIS 736 (cma 1958).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

The accused’s unauthorized absence from his organization, terminated by apprehension, resulted in his subsequent conviction of desertion, in violation of Article 85, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 885. The accused pleaded guilty to the lesser included offense of absence without leave, in violation of Article 86 of the Code, supra, 10 USC § 886.

The conviction of desertion must be set aside. The instructions were similar to those in United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287. The record is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for reference to a board of review. The board, in its discretion, may affirm the lesser offense of absence without leave and reassess the entire sentence, or it may order a rehearing on the desertion charge.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs. Judge Latimer dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Soccio
8 C.M.A. 477 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 C.M.A. 592, 8 USCMA 592, 1958 CMA LEXIS 736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-best-cma-1958.