United States v. Best
This text of 579 F. App'x 222 (United States v. Best) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Lloyd Emmanuel Best appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled “Motion to Dismiss Indictment for Lack of Exclusive Legislative and Subject Matter Jurisdiction Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure[.]” We have reviewed the record and agree that Best’s motion is meritless. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Best, No. 7:09-cr-00132-H-1 (E.D.N.C. March 31, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
579 F. App'x 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-best-ca4-2014.