United States v. Berryhill
Opinion
Marvin Paul Hicks, III, appointed counsel for Homer Berryhill in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Berryhill’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Accordingly, we DENY all remaining motions as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
710 F. App'x 434 (United States v. Berryhill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.