United States v. Berry

583 F. App'x 831

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: July 28, 2014
• Docket: Nos. 12-50380, 13-50403
• Status: Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

In these consolidated appeals, James Frank Berry appeals from the district court’s 2012 judgment revoking supervised release and imposing an 11-mqnth sentence, and the 2013 judgment revoking supervised release and imposing an 18-month sentence. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Berry’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Berry the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.