United States v. Bernard Seidling
This text of United States v. Bernard Seidling (United States v. Bernard Seidling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604
December 16, 2013
Before
DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge
WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge
MICHAEL S. KANNE, District Judge
No. 13-1854
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States Plaintiff-Appellee, District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. v. No. 3:11-cr-00126-bbc-1 BERNARD C. SEIDLING, Defendant-Appellant. Barbara B. Crabb, Judge.
ORDER
The opinion issued in the above-entitled case on December 16, 2013, is hereby amended as follows:
Page 13, line 13, first full paragraph: Although Seidling “entered a plea of guilty” should be changed to: Although Seidling “stipulated to the facts”.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Bernard Seidling, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bernard-seidling-ca7-2013.