United States v. Bernard Lipsey and Daniel Wexler
This text of 438 F.2d 974 (United States v. Bernard Lipsey and Daniel Wexler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellants were indicted, tried by a jury, and convicted of receiving, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2315, stolen stock certificates which had been transported in interstate commerce.
*975 With the exception of one ruling which excluded evidence offered for purposes of impeachment, we find appellants’ assignments of error to be without substance. After an exhaustive study of the record, we hold that the evidentiary ruling, even if erroneous, was harmless within the meaning of Rule 52(a), FRCrimP. Taken, as a whole, the court’s instructions to the jury, which are now challenged, fairly stated the applicable law and, in any event, were not objected to at the trial. In the absence of plain error, which does not here exist, the instructions cannot be attacked on appeal.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
438 F.2d 974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bernard-lipsey-and-daniel-wexler-ca9-1971.