United States v. Bernard Leavitt Durgin, III
This text of 439 F.2d 685 (United States v. Bernard Leavitt Durgin, III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a companion case to United States v. Fallang, 439 F.2d 685, in which we have today filed an opinion affirming.
The appellant in this case, Bernard Leavitt Durgin, III, was convicted on the same charge as Fallang, i. e., a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 176a, for importing the same marihuana contrary to law. Durgin was the driver of the automobile in which the suitcase full of marihuana was found.
Durgin challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury verdict. We are convinced the evidence was adequate.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
439 F.2d 685, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bernard-leavitt-durgin-iii-ca9-1971.