United States v. Bernard Joseph Labowitz
This text of 430 F.2d 1308 (United States v. Bernard Joseph Labowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted after trial by the court for interstate transportation of forged securities. 18 U.S.C. § 2314.
While the warrant for arrest had issued on an affidavit that had incorrectly referred to the securities as stolen (rather than forged), the arresting officer, on the basis of information supplied by the Los Angeles office of the FBI, had knowledge of the true facts and of appellant’s involvement with the securities. This was sufficient to constitute probable cause to believe appellant guilty of the crime charged. The arrest was proper under Ferganchick v. United States, 374 F.2d 559 (9th Cir. 1967). The handwriting exemplars obtained were thus admissible. The evidence was sufficient to support conviction.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
430 F.2d 1308, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 7516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bernard-joseph-labowitz-ca9-1970.