United States v. Bernard Duplessis

28 F.3d 1211, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 24688, 1994 WL 371103
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 18, 1994·No. 94-6556·Unpublished

Opinion

28 F.3d 1211

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Bernard DUPLESSIS, Defendant Appellant.

No. 94-6556.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 23, 1994.
Decided July 18, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-51, CA-94-220).

Bernard Duplessis, appellant Pro Se.

John Patrick Rowley, III, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Duplessis, Nos. CR-91-51; CA-94-220 (E.D. Va. Jan. 19, 1994).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

We deny Appellant's motion for production of documents and trial transcript

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bernard Duplessis, 28 F.3d 1211, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 24688, 1994 WL 371103 (4th Cir. 1994).

28 F.3d 1211 (United States v. Bernard Duplessis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.