United States v. Bernard

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Bernard

144 F. App'x 855

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedSeptember 23, 2005

DocketNo. 04-13894

StatusPublished

This text of 144 F. App'x 855 (United States v. Bernard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Bernard, 144 F. App'x 855 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having reviewed the evidence and considered argument of counsel, we find no reversible error as to the conviction in this case. Accordingly, Jacky Bernard’s conviction is affirmed. However, the government concedes there was error in sentencing and accordingly we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in light of [856]*856United States v. Booker, 548 U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having reviewed the evidence and considered argument of counsel, we find no reversible error as to the conviction in this case. Accordingly, Jacky Bernard’s conviction is affirmed. However, the government concedes there was error in sentencing and accordingly we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in light of [856]*856United States v. Booker, 548 U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 F. App'x 855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bernard-ca11-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack