United States v. Benz

24 F. Cas. 1111
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois
DecidedJuly 1, 1868
StatusPublished

This text of 24 F. Cas. 1111 (United States v. Benz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Benz, 24 F. Cas. 1111 (N.D. Ill. 1868).

Opinion

Philip Benz was indicted for making a fraudulent return of his income for taxation. It appeared that he had subscribed to a statement that his income was less than $1,000, but, after receiving a “warning.” sent at the instigation of his brother, he made a return showing an income of $3,500. Eeld, that the oath, or even subscription to the return, is not needed to constitute it a fraudulent return; but that, if the party makes a false return, intending it to be acted on by the officers of the government, knowing its contents to be untiue. an indictment will lie.

[Decided by Drummond, District Judge. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible. Statement of the point determined was taken from 7 Int. Rev. Rec. 25.1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 F. Cas. 1111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-benz-ilnd-1868.