United States v. Bentvena

Second Circuit

United States v. Bentvena

304 F.2d 883

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJuly 20, 1962

DocketNo. 400, Docket 27667

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 304 F.2d 883 (United States v. Bentvena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Bentvena, 304 F.2d 883 (2d Cir. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In view of the early expiration of some of the sentences, we at this time dismiss the appeals of Bentvena, DiPietro, Loicano, Monastersky and Sciremammano as moot on the authority of United States v. Galante, 298 F.2d 72 (2 Cir.1962), and affirm the contempt convictions of Struzzieri, Galante, Mirra, Ormento and Carmine Pánico. Decision with respect to the contempt conviction of Salvatore Pan-ico is reserved for subsequent disposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In view of the early expiration of some of the sentences, we at this time dismiss the appeals of Bentvena, DiPietro, Loicano, Monastersky and Sciremammano as moot on the authority of United States v. Galante, 298 F.2d 72 (2 Cir.1962), and affirm the contempt convictions of Struzzieri, Galante, Mirra, Ormento and Carmine Pánico. Decision with respect to the contempt conviction of Salvatore Pan-ico is reserved for subsequent disposition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

304 F.2d 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bentvena-ca2-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack