United States v. Bentley

99 F. App'x 426
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJune 2, 2004
DocketNo. 03-1935
StatusPublished

This text of 99 F. App'x 426 (United States v. Bentley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Bentley, 99 F. App'x 426 (3d Cir. 2004).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

FISHER, Circuit Judge.

Tyrone Bentley claims, for the first time on this appeal, that he should not have received a two-level upward adjustment in his offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.2. The standard of review is plain error. Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b); United States v. Torres, 209 F.3d 308, 313 (3d Cir.2000).

The government concedes that the sentencing enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.2 should not have been applied in this case, as the defendant was fleeing from armored car employees, not law enforcement officials.

The government agrees that the erroneous application of § 3C1.2 warrants a remand to permit resentencing. We will therefore vacate the judgment of sentence in this case and remand the matter for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 F. App'x 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bentley-ca3-2004.