United States v. Bent

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Bent

128 F. App'x 108

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedMay 12, 2005

DocketNo. 04-13676; D.C. Docket No. 03-20554-CR-ASG

StatusPublished

This text of 128 F. App'x 108 (United States v. Bent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Bent, 128 F. App'x 108 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

Sheryl Joyce Lowenthal, appointed counsel for Denniston Glenroy Bent in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bent’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT:

Sheryl Joyce Lowenthal, appointed counsel for Denniston Glenroy Bent in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bent’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 F. App'x 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bent-ca11-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack