United States v. Bent

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Bent

128 F. App'x 108

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 12, 2005·No. No. 04-13676; D.C. Docket No. 03-20554-CR-ASG·Published

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

Sheryl Joyce Lowenthal, appointed counsel for Denniston Glenroy Bent in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bent’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT:

Sheryl Joyce Lowenthal, appointed counsel for Denniston Glenroy Bent in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bent’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Bent, 128 F. App'x 108 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

128 F. App'x 108 (United States v. Bent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related