United States v. Bennie Thomas
This text of 989 F.2d 277 (United States v. Bennie Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Bennie Thomas appeals his sentences for one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine and three counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B) (1988 & Supp. II 1990). Thomas contends the district court should have reduced his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 (Nov. 1991) for acceptance of responsibility because he pleaded guilty to all four counts. We disagree. A defendant who pleads guilty is not entitled to an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction as a matter of right. See id. § 3El.l(c); United States v. Lublin, 981 F.2d 367, 370 (8th Cir.1992). Thomas committed two of the offenses while released on bond pending trial for the other two offenses. Because Thomas continued his criminal activity, we conclude the district court-properly denied the acceptance-of-responsibility reduction. See United States v. Hibbert, 929 F.2d 434, 435 (8th Cir.1991) (per curiam); *278 United States v. Wivell, 893 F.2d 156, 159 (8th Cir.1990).
Accordingly, we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
989 F.2d 277, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 5735, 1993 WL 80468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bennie-thomas-ca8-1993.