United States v. Bennie Dean Herring, Billy Clyde Herring, Ronald Mills, and Dee Dee Bell
This text of 977 F.2d 1435 (United States v. Bennie Dean Herring, Billy Clyde Herring, Ronald Mills, and Dee Dee Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
977 F.2d 1435, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 29707, 1992 WL 316320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bennie-dean-herring-billy-clyde-herring-ronald-mills-ca11-1992.