United States v. Bennie Dean Herring, Billy Clyde Herring, Ronald Mills, and Dee Dee Bell
977 F.2d 1435, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 29707, 1992 WL 316320
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 3, 1992·No. 90-7280·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Bennie Dean Herring, Billy Clyde Herring, Ronald Mills, and Dee Dee Bell, 977 F.2d 1435, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 29707, 1992 WL 316320 (11th Cir. 1992).
977 F.2d 1435 (United States v. Bennie Dean Herring, Billy Clyde Herring, Ronald Mills, and Dee Dee Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ex Parte Soto
991 So. 2d 691 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2008)
United States v. One MacOm Video Cipher Ii, Sn A6j050073, Anthony E. Goldberg, Claimant-Appellee
985 F.2d 258 (Sixth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Hochman
809 F. Supp. 202 (E.D. New York, 1992)