United States v. Benn

645 F. App'x 282
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 21, 2016
DocketNo. 15-7959
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 645 F. App'x 282 (United States v. Benn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Benn, 645 F. App'x 282 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alton Benn seeks to appeal the district court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s denial of Benn’s motion to expand the record in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) proceedings. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral' orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Benn seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Frank Dodge
963 F.3d 379 (Fourth Circuit, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
645 F. App'x 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-benn-ca4-2016.