United States v. Benjamin Zamora-Delgado
This text of 112 F.3d 518 (United States v. Benjamin Zamora-Delgado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
112 F.3d 518
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Benjamin ZAMORA-DELGADO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 96-50438.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 21, 1997.*
Decided April 28, 1997.
Before: BROWNING, THOMPSON and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Benjamin Zamora-Delgado appeals his conviction by conditional guilty plea and the sentence imposed for illegal reentry by a previously departed aggravated felon in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, contending he was entitled to national discovery regarding prosecution of illegal reentry cases. We affirm the district court because this contention is foreclosed by our recent opinion in United States v. Candia-Veleta, 104 F.3d 243 (9th Cir.1996).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 F.3d 518, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 14612, 1997 WL 210836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-benjamin-zamora-delgado-ca9-1997.