United States v. Benjamin Avalos-Zarate

Tenth Circuit

United States v. Benjamin Avalos-Zarate

19 F.3d 34, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 13139, 1994 WL 75852

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedMarch 8, 1994

Docket93-2186

StatusPublished

This text of 19 F.3d 34 (United States v. Benjamin Avalos-Zarate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Benjamin Avalos-Zarate, 19 F.3d 34, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 13139, 1994 WL 75852 (10th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

19 F.3d 34

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Benjamin AVALOS-ZARATE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-2186.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

March 8, 1994.

Before TACHA, BRORBY and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT1

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This appeal is from an order of the district court sentencing defendant to 37 months of imprisonment to be followed by three years of supervised release. Defendant appeals on the grounds that the district court erred in failing to sentence defendant at the low end of the applicable range of the United States Sentencing Guidelines and that he was placed in an incorrect criminal history category. Defendant was sentenced within the applicable guideline range. Therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal. United States v. Garcia, 919 F.2d 1478 (10th Cir.1990). The appeal is DISMISSED. The request of counsel, Mr. Richard C. Cauble, for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

1

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

19 F.3d 34

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Benjamin AVALOS-ZARATE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-2186.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

March 8, 1994.

Before TACHA, BRORBY and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT1

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This appeal is from an order of the district court sentencing defendant to 37 months of imprisonment to be followed by three years of supervised release. Defendant appeals on the grounds that the district court erred in failing to sentence defendant at the low end of the applicable range of the United States Sentencing Guidelines and that he was placed in an incorrect criminal history category. Defendant was sentenced within the applicable guideline range. Therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal. United States v. Garcia, 919 F.2d 1478 (10th Cir.1990). The appeal is DISMISSED. The request of counsel, Mr. Richard C. Cauble, for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

1

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 F.3d 34, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 13139, 1994 WL 75852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-benjamin-avalos-zarate-ca10-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack