United States v. Benito Flores-Diaz, United States of America v. Francisco Aros-Gonzales
This text of 411 F.2d 1224 (United States v. Benito Flores-Diaz, United States of America v. Francisco Aros-Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
411 F.2d 1224
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Benito FLORES-DIAZ, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Francisco AROS-GONZALES, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 23430, 23431.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
May 29, 1969.
Rehearings Denied June 26, 1969.
Albert Morrow, Tucson, Ariz. (argued) for Flores-Diaz.
Lawrence Ollason, Tucson, Ariz. (argued) for Aros-Gonzales.
Reuben Salter (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Edward E. Davis, U.S. Atty., Jo Ann D. Diamos, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for appellee.
Before BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and KILKENNY, District judge.1
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction of the appellant Francisco Aros-Gonzales is affirmed.
The judgment of conviction of the appellant Benito Flores-Diaz is reversed by reason of the insufficiency of the evidence to show knowledge on his part, either by direct evidence or presumptively, of the existence of marijuana hidden in the automobile; the matter is remanded with instructions to dismiss as to him.
The Honorable John F. Kilkenny, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
411 F.2d 1224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-benito-flores-diaz-united-states-of-america-v-francisco-ca9-1969.