United States v. Benigno Ayala-Juarez
This text of 472 F. App'x 307 (United States v. Benigno Ayala-Juarez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Benigno Ayala-Juarez (Ayala) appeals the sentence he received after he pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and to possession of ammunition by a convicted felon. Each count charged a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Ayala argues that under United States v. Berry, 977 F.2d 915, 919-20 (5th Cir.1992), his conviction and sentence on one of his counts must be vacated because his two convictions and sentences are multiplicitous and violate the Double Jeopardy Clause. The government agrees and has filed an Unopposed Motion for Summary Remand in lieu of Filing Appellee’s Brief.
The government’s motion is GRANTED. Ayala’s sentences are VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for dismissal of the multiplicitous count and for resentencing on the count selected by the government. See Berry, 977 F.2d at 919-20; United States v. Osunegbu, 822 F.2d 472, 481 (5th Cir.1987).
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
472 F. App'x 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-benigno-ayala-juarez-ca5-2012.