United States v. Benigno Ayala-Juarez

472 F. App'x 307
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 2, 2012
Docket11-41103
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 472 F. App'x 307 (United States v. Benigno Ayala-Juarez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Benigno Ayala-Juarez, 472 F. App'x 307 (5th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Benigno Ayala-Juarez (Ayala) appeals the sentence he received after he pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and to possession of ammunition by a convicted felon. Each count charged a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Ayala argues that under United States v. Berry, 977 F.2d 915, 919-20 (5th Cir.1992), his conviction and sentence on one of his counts must be vacated because his two convictions and sentences are multiplicitous and violate the Double Jeopardy Clause. The government agrees and has filed an Unopposed Motion for Summary Remand in lieu of Filing Appellee’s Brief.

The government’s motion is GRANTED. Ayala’s sentences are VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for dismissal of the multiplicitous count and for resentencing on the count selected by the government. See Berry, 977 F.2d at 919-20; United States v. Osunegbu, 822 F.2d 472, 481 (5th Cir.1987).

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Cristobal Meza, III
701 F.3d 411 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
472 F. App'x 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-benigno-ayala-juarez-ca5-2012.