United States v. Beneby

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Beneby

672 F. App'x 977

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 6, 2017·No. No. 16-10269 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Moss, Jr., appointed counsel for Robert Beneby in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record, including Bene-by’s response to counsel’s motion, reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Beneby’s convictions and total sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Moss, Jr., appointed counsel for Robert Beneby in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record, including Bene-by’s response to counsel’s motion, reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Beneby’s convictions and total sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Beneby, 672 F. App'x 977 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

672 F. App'x 977 (United States v. Beneby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related