United States v. Beltz

CourtNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
DecidedSeptember 20, 2021
Docket202100057
StatusPublished

This text of United States v. Beltz (United States v. Beltz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Beltz, (N.M. 2021).

Opinion

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before MONAHAN, STEPHENS, and DEERWESTER Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES Appellee

v.

Drake A. BELTZ Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

No. 202100057

Decided: 22 September 2021

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Andrea C. Goode (arraignment) John P. Norman (trial)

Sentence adjudged 17 November 2020 by a general court-martial convened at Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sen- tence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for 16 months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, 1 and a bad-conduct discharge.

1 The convening authority waived automatic forfeitures for a period of six months from the date of the Entry of Judgment, and suspended the adjudged forfeitures of all pay and allowance for a period of 16 months provided Appellant maintains an allotment for the benefit of his dependents for the duration of the suspension. United States v. Beltz, NMCCA No. 202100057 Opinion of the Court

For Appellant: Captain William F. Halsey, JAGC, USN

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 2 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court

2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Beltz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-beltz-nmcca-2021.