United States v. Beltran
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jose Luis Beltran appeals his 37-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction to two counts of distribution of a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U. S.C. § 841(a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Beltran’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no arguable issues for review, and a motion to [933]*933withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our examination of the briefs and independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues warranting review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRTANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
59 F. App'x 932 (United States v. Beltran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.