United States v. Bellamy

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Bellamy

559 F. App'x 212

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 5, 2014·No. No. 13-8005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Claude Wendell Bellamy appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to relate back and amend. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. United States v. Bellamy, No. 7:99-cr-00049-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 6, 2013). We deny Bellamy's motion [213] for relief from judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Claude Wendell Bellamy appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to relate back and amend. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. United States v. Bellamy, No. 7:99-cr-00049-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 6, 2013). We deny Bellamy's motion [213] for relief from judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Bellamy, 559 F. App'x 212 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

559 F. App'x 212 (United States v. Bellamy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related