United States v. Bellamy
473 F. App'x 342
Opinion
Claude Wendell Bellamy appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for correction or modification of the record. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we [343] affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bellamy v. United States, No. 7:99-cr-00049-F-1, 2012 WL 845506 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Bellamy, 473 F. App'x 342 (4th Cir. 2012).
473 F. App'x 342 (United States v. Bellamy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.