United States v. Bellahcen

Second Circuit

United States v. Bellahcen

80 F. App'x 149

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedNovember 13, 2003

DocketNo. 03-1020

StatusPublished

This text of 80 F. App'x 149 (United States v. Bellahcen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Bellahcen, 80 F. App'x 149 (2d Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Appellant Jaouad Bellahcen appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on December 26, 2002 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Harold Baer, Judge), and following a plea of guilty to the sole count in the indictment filed against him. The indictment charged that Bellahcen trafficked in and used one or more unauthorized access devices-namely, stolen telephone calling card numbers issued by AT & T, Inc.-in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1029(a)(2) and (2).

The sole issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred when it found that Bellahcen was responsible for between $1.5 million and $2.5 million in loss, and thus imposed a 12-level enhancement to [150]*150Bellahcen’s sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1(b)(1)(M).

We have reviewed the record, and we find no error in the District Court’s enhancement of Bellahcen’s sentence. Accordingly, we hereby AFFIRM the judgment of conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Appellant Jaouad Bellahcen appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on December 26, 2002 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Harold Baer, Judge), and following a plea of guilty to the sole count in the indictment filed against him. The indictment charged that Bellahcen trafficked in and used one or more unauthorized access devices-namely, stolen telephone calling card numbers issued by AT & T, Inc.-in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1029(a)(2) and (2).

The sole issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred when it found that Bellahcen was responsible for between $1.5 million and $2.5 million in loss, and thus imposed a 12-level enhancement to [150]*150Bellahcen’s sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1(b)(1)(M).

We have reviewed the record, and we find no error in the District Court’s enhancement of Bellahcen’s sentence. Accordingly, we hereby AFFIRM the judgment of conviction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 F. App'x 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bellahcen-ca2-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack